Current Therapeutic Targets for Neuropathic Pain

 

Khemchand R. Surana1*, Abhijeet G. Parkhe2, Eknath D. Ahire3, Anuprita R. Pawar1,

Survarna Khairnar4, Sunil K. Mahajan5, Dhananjay M. Patil6, Deepak D. Sonawane6,

Sanjay J. Kshirsagar3,

1Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Shreeshakti Shaikshanik Sanstha,

Divine College of Pharmacy, Satana, Nashik.

2Bharati Vidhyapeeth College of Pharmacy, Belapur, Navi Mumbai.

3Department of Pharmaceutics, MET’s, Institute of Pharmacy, BKC, Adgaon, Nashik – 3.

4Department of Pharmacology, Shreeshakti Shaikshanik Sanstha, Divine College of Pharmacy, Satana, Nashik.

5Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, MGV’s Pharmacy College, Panchvati, Nashik.

6Department of Pharmaceutics, Shreeshakti Shaikshanik Sanstha, Divine College of Pharmacy, Satana, Nashik.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: khemchandsurana411@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Nociceptive ache signals the frame to capability or real tissue harm. By contrast, neuropathic ache, which ends from damage or harm to the worried system, persists lengthy in spite of everything symptoms and symptoms of the authentic damage have disappeared. This kind of maladaptive ache affords a full-size scientific problem, because it responds poorly or unpredictably to classical analgesics. There is likewise no single, uniformly well-tolerated drug this is reliably helpful. Neuropathic ache withinside the popular populace is expected to have a occurrence ranging among 3% and 17%. Most of the remedies for neuropathic ache have slight efficacy and gift aspect consequences that restriction their use; therefore, different healing strategies are wished for patients. In this article, the contemporary trendy of care treatment, the rising pharmacological strategies until date, and the preclinical research on novel promising healing alternatives could be reviewed.

 

KEYWORDS: Neuropathic pain, Inflammation, Drugs acting on neuropathic pain, Cannabinoid receptor.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Neuropathic pain most of the time disease of somatosensory system. Characteristic of neuropathic pain involves burning, tingling, sensitivity to touch, ache resulting from mild pressure, electric powered shock-like ache, ache to cold or heat, and numbness1.

 

The risk factors are essential to determine to avoid Neuropathic ache growing in at-hazard individuals. Secondary prevention includes administering prophylactic interventions to people who are experiencing an illness, damage or remedy that may motive persistent neuropathic ache. On the idea of the treatment that can cause chronic neuropathic pain. On the basis of the assumption that characteristic qualities indicative of neuropathic pain in sensory perception are present, several screening tools have been developed to identify neuropathic pain conditions or neuropathic components to chronic pain syndromes. With the help of other tools, Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory is more specifically developed for the measuring of neuropathic symptoms and dimensions and have contributed to further phenotype individual patients for clinical trials2,3. The management of neuropathic pain majorly focuses on treating symptoms. Acetaminophen, NSAIDs or weak opioids generally do not respond to neuropathic pain. The traditional approach such as Nerve blocks and neuromodulation for the management of a neuropathic pain patient is to initiate treatment with conservative pharmacological and complementary therapies before interventional strategies. There are two type of neuropathic pain. Peripheral Neuropathic examples are Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, Radiculopathy, Trigeminal Neuropathy, Post-Herpetic Neuralgia and Central Neuropathic Pain such as Post-stroke Pain, Multiple Sclerosis-related pain, Compressive myelopathy from spinal stenosis4,5.

 

Epidemiology:

Studies revealed that the neuropathic component may be present in 35% of all painful syndromes. Estimates of prevalence based on specific neuropathic pain (NP) causes tend to be lower (1-2%) than those based on classic symptoms reports (6-8%). German population in general are respondents, among them 6.5% have reported chronic neuropathic pain characteristics and have reported higher intensity and more interference of pain in their daily activities as compared to individuals with chronic non-neuropathic pain 6. A study calculating NP pain incidence rates in the general population of the Netherlands has included 362,693 people registered during at least one year in the 1996 and 2003 and has identified 9135 new cases of NP i.e.  8.2 per 1000 patients/year. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia are 0.72 and 0.42 per 1000 patients/year respectively. NP was more common among females as compared to males and has reached its peak between 70 and 79 years of age in both the genders. In the United Kingdom from January 1992 to April 2002 has shown incidence of 40/100 thousand people/year for post therapeutic neuralgia, 26 to 27 for trigeminal neuralgia, 1 to 2 for phantom limb pain, and 15 to 16 for painful diabetic neuropathy. Also study carried out in 2008 has shown that the prevalence of NP in Austria was 3.3%, being higher in patients with 41-50 (26%) and 51-60 (25%) years of age 177,8.


 

Figure 1: Diagnosis and line of treatment for neuropathic pain.

 

Figure 2: Current therapeutic molecule used for the neuropathic pain

 

Table 1: Molecules and their targets9-11

Exogenous Cannabinoid

Influence on Endocannabinoid system

Effect in pain

A-836, A-339

Cannabinoid 2-R agonist

CB2-R-mediated anti-hyperalgesic effect in Freund’s adjuvant model of inflammatory pain; analgetic in the Chronic constriction injury model (CCI), skin incision, and capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia models.

GW-405833

Cannabinoid 2-R agonist

Reduction of mechanical allodynia and glial activation in long-term treatment in neuropathic rats.

OL-135

Reversible FAAH inhibitor

Decrease of mechanical allodynia and acetone-induced cold allodynia in mice CCI model.

PF-3845

FAAH inhibitor

Attenuation of mechanical and cold allodynia in wild-type mice in CCI model.

URB-602

MAGL inhibitor

Elevation of 2-AG level in the dorsal midbrain and enhancement of Anti-nociception in SIA model.

SR141716A

Cannabinoid 1-R antagonist

Prevention of antiallodynic properties of WIN55, 212-2 in rat SNL model; blockage of HU210-induced attenuation of increased locomotor activity.

SR-144528

Cannabinoid 2-R antagonist

Prevention of antiarthritic effects of CB2-R agonists in CIA model in chronic administration.

URB-597

Irreversible FAAH inhibitor

Potentiation of antinociception after injection into the dorsolateral PAG in SIA model; elevation of PAG anandamide and 2-AG level safter intra-PAG injection in healthy rats and decrease of mechanical allodynia and acetone-induced cold allodynia in mice CCI model.

WIN-55, 212-2

CB1-/CB2-R agonist

Alleviation of thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia in CCI model and effectivness against thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia in SNL model.

 


Current Therapeutic Targets for Neuropathic Pain:

Derivatives of sulphonamides:

Analgesic Activity of Acyl-sulfonamides:

GX-201 was dosed orally, and followed by subcutaneous aconitine injection into the dorsum of the hind paw. The NaV1.7-selective acylsulfonamide (GX-201) displayed dose dependent efficacy in the IEM (Immuno-electron microscopy) assay across aconitine-induced pain. This compound exhibited a similar dose-dependent inhibition of aconitine-induced nociceptive events at higher plasma concentrations1,12.

 

Analgesic Activity of Aryl-sulfonamides:

A selective arylsulfonamide antagonist of NaV1.7, PF-05089771 was approved by Pfizer for analgesic activity with patients having inherited erythromelalgia. The likely explanations for the difference in efficacy between acyl- and arylsulfonamides fall into three categories, inaccurate measures of IC50 or free fraction, Tissue distribution and access to binding site is more favorable for acylsulfonamides, and Acylsulfonamides have a significantly longer residence time on NaV1.7, resulting in greater efficacy13.

 

Cannabinoid receptors (Exogenous cannabinoids):

Cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2) have been associated to pain modulation, receptor activation may causes pain. Exogenous cannabinoids are involved in the analgesic mechanisms of medications commonly account for Neuropathic pain.  Cannabinoids can be divided into four different groups. The first group includes the classical cannabinoids, which consist of natural cannabinoids (such as THC) and synthetics (such as HU-210)14. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the component in cannabis responsible for its therapeutic effects. Another component, Cannabindiol (CBD), has an additive effect. The second group contains non classical cannabinoids; CP-55 is a nonspecific cannabinoid receptor agonist. The third class consists of aminoalkylindoles, which are synthetic cannabinoids such as AM1241. Diarylopyrazoles form the fourth group, which collectively consists of specific cannabinoid receptor antagonists, where SR141716A is a representative 19. Exist literature suggest that targeting the endocannabinoid system for prevention and treatment of CINP (Chemotherapy induced neuropathic pain) and antiretroviral-drug induced neuropathic pain is a plausible therapeutic option15-18.

 

Angiotensin II type 2(AT2) Receptor:

AT2 receptor antagonists represent a completely new class for targeting and designing of drugs 2. EMA 401 is orally active, highly selective, peripherally restricted AT2 receptor antagonist that has been successful in a clinical proof of concept trial phase II in patients with post therapeutic neuralgia. EMA 40 has been demonstrated and found to be effective in a clinical trial in post therapeutic neuralgia. Although it is still in the preclinical phase, studies show promising results of stem cell treatment for neuropathic pain19.

 

Imidazoline- 2 (I2) Receptor:

Literature search reflects, molecules targeting imidazoline-2 (I2) receptors could be a novel class of analgesics. I2 receptors are widely dispersed in mammalian cells and tissues, particularly in the central and peripheral nervous system. On the other hand nature and signaling pathways of I2 receptors is not fully understood. They allosterically regulate the activity of enzymes tangled in brain energy requirements and the monoaminergic descending pathways of pain control. CR4056 is a reversible and specific I2 ligand, as determined in a broad characterization panel in vitro. Oral CR4056 shows a potent, dose response analgesic activity in different animal models of nociceptive and neuropathic pain. In addition, the compound has a strong opioid-like activity and prevents tolerance to morphine similarly to I2 agonist tool compounds. CR4056 was extensively studied in phase 1 clinical studies, where it proved to be safe and well tolerated. The compound is now in phase 2 clinical development as a non-opioid analgesic for the treatment of acute and chronic pain. CR4056 is a non-opioid analgesic in knee Osteoarthritis patients with moderate to severe chronic pain and different phenotypes. Most common adverse event is headache and is reported in 13% population20,21.

 

Lymphocyte function associated antigen 1 (LFA-1):

A potential therapeutic approach was examined with the goal of controlling proinflammatory responses in neuroanatomical regions critical for chronic constructive injury (CCI) induced allodynia by blocking LFA-1 actions using BIRT377. The small molecule, (R)-5-(4-bromobenzyl)-3-(3, 5-dichlorophenyl) - 1, 5-dimethyl imidazolidine-2, 4-dione (BIRT377) is a low molecular weight non-ionic compound. It avoids the conversion of LFA-1 into its high-affinity conformation through non-covalent binding to the CD11a chain, which is a component of LFA-1. So, upon BIRT377 binding to LFA-1, circulating leukocyte cell adhesion, infiltration and migration to sites of inflammation are prevented BIRT377 is highly selective for LFA-122.

 

FAAH and MAGL: (Fatty acid amide hydrolase and Mono-acyl glycerol lipase):

FAAH is the AEA hydrolyzing enzyme which is an integral membrane enzyme. Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) is an enzyme that hydrolyzes the endocannabinoid anandamide, 2-Arachidonoyl glycerol and related amidatedsignaling lipids. FAAH inhibitors are of two types reversibly (e.g., trifluoromethyl ketones; α-ketoheterocycles) and irreversibly (e.g., fluorophosphonates; carbamates; ureas) acting agents. Several FAAH inhibitors have various mechanisms to inhibit FAAH and have different chemistry from one another. FAAH and MAGL has simplified the functional investigation of AEA and 2-AG signaling pathways, respectively. The dual FAAH/MAGL inhibitorJZL195 provides a powerful pharmacological probe to assess the behavioral impact of simultaneous elevations in the two principal endocannabinoids AEA and 2-AG23. They have designed dual FAAH/MAGL inhibitors based on an electrophilic N-carbonyl piperidine/piperazine structural motif common to both the MAGL-selective inhibitor JZL184, and the FAAH-selective inhibitors PF-622 and PF-3845. JZL195 also inhibited rat and human FAAH and MAGL enzymes with IC50 values in the range of 10–100 nM. It also inhibits endocannabinoid hydrolysis and elevates 2 AG and AEA level in vivo. A number of authors have believed that selective FAAH inhibitors, such as URB597, OL-135, PF-3845, PF- 04457845 and ST-4070 reduce the mechanical and cold allodynia induced in a range of animal models of chronic pain. These all drugs can be categorized under the category called novel endocannabinoid modulator24.

 

Substrate-derived inhibitors:

The trifluoromethyl ketone analogue of oleamide was displayed to be a potent inhibitor of this enzymatic activity (Ki = 82nM). The enzyme capable for the hydrolysis of AEA and oleamide was analyzed and charac­terized from studies using trifluoromethyl ketone analoguewhere a thiol was introduced at the terminus of the acyl chain and linked through a disulfide bond to beads. Another prominent substrate-derived inhibitor is MAFP, Substrate-based inhibitors have provided useful chemical tools, but they are not viable templates for drug design because they are highly hydrophobic and have low selectivity25.

 

Monoglyceride Lipase (MGL):

MGL-deficiency is related with decreased CB1 receptor density, reduced CB1 receptor ligand binding, and resistance to the hypometabolic effects of CB receptor agonists i.e. simply, CB receptor desensitization. MGL blockade tends to CB receptor desensitization. One of the first selective inhibitors developed was JZL184 which inhibits MGL by irreversible active site carbamylatio. JZL184 inhibits around 90% of 2-AG hydrolase activity in the brain and results in strong accumulation of 2-AG and other MGs 30 min after administration. However, MGs did not elevate in all tissues which could either indicate that MGL activity is committed by other MG hydrolase in certain tissues or that JZL184. The orally active MGL inhibitor SAR127303 has been believed to have anti-nociceptive properties, and it was accepted that even with repeated administration no tolerance caused since the effects were maintained in the formalin test. Administration of the highly selective MGL inhibitor KML29 produces analgesia without cannabimimetic side effects, its chronic administration, however, results in CB1 receptor desensitization, as similarly observed for other MGL inhibitors26.

 

 

Electrophilic ketone inhibitors:

Electrophilic ketone inhibitor like α-ketoheterocycle (OL-135) is a highly selective inhibitor but In-Vivo results produce only transient elevations in AEA. Different modification in the chemical structure of parent molecule can results in production of significantly higher activity novel molecules. The incorporation of a nitrogen into the benzoxazole resulted in oxazolopyridine, which increased the potency > 50-fold (Ki = 2.3 nM). These compounds showed higher potency (Ki = 0.2 – 0.3nM) and were much more favorable to further structural modification. Efforts to optimize the heterocycle resulted in the unfused pyridyl oxazole. OL-135 exhibited > 10,000-fold selectivity for FAAH over KIAA1363 and 60-fold selectivity over triacylglycerol hydrolase. The potency further was recovered and the selectivity was increased with pyridyloxadiazole (Ki = 0.29 nM). The electrophilic character of the ketone should prove to be critical for FAAH activity. Boger et al. have further developed a series of oxazoles with small substituent for the same targets. Series of oxazoles with small substituent and showed that FAAH inhibition potency tracked with the electron-withdrawing potential of the R group which shows might be the potential molecules in clinic for neuropathic pain. Like wise Series of ketooxazole FAAH inhibitors in which they have introduced a piperidine into the acyl side chain resulting in increased solubility which effective in increasing bioavailability of drugs. Another class of drugs such as reversible inhibitors α-ketoheterocycle OL-135has been found to display good in vitro potency and selectivity for FAAH relative to other serine hydrolases in mammalian proteomes. FAAH inhibitors may prove to be potential candidates for the treatment of nervous system disorders27,28.

 

 

Carbamate inhibitors:

URB532 and URB597 are the examples of carbamate inhibitors discovered by Piomelli and colleagues. These drugs raised endogenous brain levels of anandamide and other NAEs approximately 3–5 fold and produced CB1-dependent anxiolytic and analgesic effects 10. The first carbamate inhibitors of FAAH were designed by modulating the structure of a known inhibitor of the serine hydrolase acetyl cholinesterase. The 5- fold improved potency was shown by meta-biphenyl derivative (IC50 = 63 nM) and addition of an amide on the biphenyl resulted in a further 10-fold increased potency to give URB597 (IC50 = 4.6 nM) [29]. Arguably, the well-studied FAAH inhibitor to date is URB597, an irreversible inhibitor of FAAH with high selectivity in the nervous system. However, URB597 shows some notable shortcomings, including the inactivation of other serine hydrolases in peripheral tissues. By replacing the cyclohexylring of with β-naphthylmethyl ring gives URB880 which also responsible for further increase in potency. Later, Cravatt and Alexander prepared a hybrid of OL-135 and URB597 in which the cyclohexyl was removed and further replaced with phenhexyl to give JP83. Later, the design of a ‘clickable’ carbamate activity-based probe (JP104) is done to display the proteome reactivity of FAAH-directed carbamates in vivo. These compounds could be categorised into two gen­eral classes, aryl/heteroaryl alkyl carbamate as exemplified by SA-47 and piperazine/piperidine carboxylates shown by compound. The corresponding N-ethyl carbamate and urea analogue were inactive because it was proved that the phenyl carbamate is functioning as an electrophile resulting in covalent modification of FAAH. Irreversible phenyl carbamate inhibitors, such as URB597, inactivate other hydrolases in peripheral tissues, including several carboxylesterases. 2-(Methylamino)-2-oxoethyl carbamates SA-47 seem to be more selective for FAAH than the phenyl carbamates29.

 

Urea inhibitors:

Urea inhibitor, PF-3845 selectively inhibits FAAH in vivo and produces significant cannabinoid receptor-dependent reductions in inflammatory pain. Mechanistic and structural studies confirm that PF-3845 is a covalent inhibitor that carbamylates FAAH’s serine nucleophile. Since 2006, Takeda, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, and Astellas have reported piperazine/piperidine aryl ureas as a rising class of FAAH inhibitors. In 2007, Pfizer presented the Scripps Research Institute reported that the quinolinepiperidine urea PF-750 inhibited FAAH in a time-dependent manner. PF-750 selectively inhibited FAAH relative to other mamma­lian serine hydrolases as determined by ABPP (Activity Based Protein Profiling). More recently, a series of biaryl ether urea analogues with boost in potency have been reported. PF-3845 is also one of the most potent inhibitor. In addition, the trifluoromethyl group of moleculewas replaced with an alkyne to generate ‘clickable’ ABPP probe that was used to profile the in vivoselectivity of this inhibitor. Given the covalent, irreversible inhibition of FAAH, the potency of irreversible inhibitors was measured by the second order rate constants are the best analysis of potencies of irreversible inhibitors30.

 

Boronic acid inhibitors:

Recently, Infinity has discussed a series of aryl boronic acids as inhibitors of FAAH in a patent application. It is hypothesized that the boronic acids form a reversible covalent complex with the active site serine nucleophile of FAAH and the aryl ring is directed toward the hydrophobic acyl chain-binding channel. Publication from the University of Kuopio in Finland has also reported a series of boronic acid FAAH inhibitors with alkenyl boronic acid being the most potent (IC50 = 14 nM). Boronic acids have previously been reported as covalent inhibitors of serine proteases, and so it will be important to assess the selectivity of these compounds against miscellaneous serine hydrolases. In near future this target can be a potential target for neuropathic pain drug development31.

 

Interleukin-17 (IL-17):

The proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-17 (IL-17) is implicated in pain regulation. However, the synaptic mechanisms by which IL-17 regulates pain transmission are unknown.IL-17 suppresses inhibitory synaptic transmission by inhibiting GABA-receptor-mediated currents. In the DRG (dorsal root ganglion), IL-17 increases neuronal excitability and IL-17R contributes to paclitaxel-induced nocicepto hyperactivity. IL-17 mediates paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain by T-cell-independent mechanism. IL-17 regulates pain via neuron-glial interactions both in the spinal cord and DRG. Over expression of IL-17 in spinal astrocytes induces mechanical allodynia. Here, we report that glia-produced IL-17 suppresses inhibitory synaptic transmission in the spinal cord pain circuit and drives chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain. Recently, IL-17 was found to regulate inflammatory responses associated with neuropathic pain induced by nerve injury. IL-17 levels are upregulated in injured nerves in neuropathic pain models. Here, they investigated that IL-17 and IL-17R modulate excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission of SOM+ excitatory neurons in normal and pathological pain conditions, and we further tested the involvement of IL- 17/IL-17R signaling in the paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain model32.

 

MT1/MT2 receptors (Melatonin Receptor 1 and 2):

Melatonin (MLT) and its analogs are gaining attention in the recent years due to their protective properties against various injuries to the nervous system. Accumulating data indicate that MLT plays a key role in numerous physiological processes including circadian rhythm regulation, body mass index maintenance reproduction, immune responses, neuroprotection, and cardio protection.MLT is also known to have strong antitumor, anti-inflammatory, and anti-oxidant effects. MLT is now being considered as a potential candidate for future adjuvant, in combination with opioid drugs for treating chronic pain conditions. In addition to MLT recently many MT2 agonists were approved to for the treatment of depression and insomnia. The anti-allodynic effects were blocked upon administration of non-selective opioid receptor antagonist naloxone and MT1/MT2 antagonist luzindole. It is reported that intrathecal administration of MLT can reduce the intensity and length of capsaicin-induced allodynia and hyperalgesia resultant from capsaicin injection. 8-Methoxy-2-propionamidotetralin (8MPDOT), N-{2-[(3- methoxyphenyl) phenylaminoethylacetamide (UCM765), N- {2-([3-bromophenyl]-4-fluorophenylamino) ethyl acetamide (UCM924) and N-[(1-benzyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-5-methoxyquinolin-2-yl) methyl] propionamide (UCM1014) and iik-7 N Butanoyl 2-(9-methoxy-6H-iso-indolo[2,1-a]indol-11-yl)- ethanamine are some of the recently developed MT-2 agonists4.Some of the reported MT-2 agonists were known to be very effective in the management of neuropathic pain with several benefits over MLT and comparative effects to that of clinically approved analgesic33.

 

Voltage-gated sodium channels:

(Navs or VGSCs) are a family of transmembrane proteins that plays an important role in electrical signaling of cells in various tissues. Nine isoforms of Nav channels have been identified to date, nomenclated Nav1.1 to Nav1.9 34. We will discuss these channels in more detail in below table.

 

The rationale for targeting a specific subtype of sodium-channel blocker for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain is to avoid side effects associated with activity on other Nav subtypes, or possibly even other receptor classes. Most Nav blockers currently used for pain management are nonselective;these drugs are known for their narrow therapeutic index and multiple serious adverse effects due to their action on Nav subtypes in the CNS and the heart, such as dizziness, sedation, convulsions, and cardio toxicity. When considering the selectivity profile of a safe Nav blocker for management of pain, one must keep in mind expected side effects based on expression patterns35,36.

 

Table 2: Different sodium channels and their tissue expression34

Subtype

Gene

Tissue expression

1.1

SCN1a

CNS

1.2

SCN2a

CNS

1.3

SCN3a

Mainly expressed during embryonic development, but upregulated in adult sensory nerves and DRG neurons after nerve injury

1.4

SCN4a

Skeletal muscle

1.5

SCN5a

Heart muscle

1.6

SCN8a

CNS, DRG neurons, large motor and sensory neurons

1.7

SCN9a

Olfactory sensory neurons, sensory neurons, pancreatic β-cells, skin, DRG neurons

1.8

SCN10a

Retina, sensory neurons, heart muscle, skin, DRG neurons

1.9

SCN11a

Retina, sensory neurons, DRG neurons

 

Table 3: Novel therapeutic targets (in clinical trials) for neuropathic pain37,38

Drug

Company

Mechanism

Phase

Indication

Prialt (ziconotide)

Elan/ Eisai

N-type Ca-channel blocker, intrathecal

Launched

Severe chronic pain

Lacosamide (Vimpat,

Harkoseride)

SchwarzPharma

Nav block

Phase 3

Positive in PDN. Evaluation in fibromyalgia and OA ongoing

Topamax topiramate

JandJ

Glut antag/ GABA agonist/ Nablocker

Phase 3

Launch for epilepsy and migraine.

XP13512

GSK/ Xenoport

Pro-Gabapentin

Phase 2

Recruiting Phase 2

TC6499

GSK/ Targacept

Neuronal nicotinic receptorAgonist

Phase 1

Recruiting Phase 1

Retigabine

Valeant

Potassium channel KCNQ2/3opener

Phase 3

Efficacy in epilepsy

NGD8243 (MRK2295)

Merck

TRPV1 antag

Phase 2

Postoperative dental pain

Transacin (Transdolor,

NGX-4010) (topical)

NeurogesX

TRPV1 agonist (capsaicin)

Phase 3 (HIV)

Pain reduction in HIV

Sativex, GW-1000, Buccal spray

GW Pharma

Cannabinoid-receptor agonist

Phase 3, Phase 2 in PDN

Approved for cancer and MS pain. Effective in NP with allodynia

IP 751, CT-3, ajulemic acid

Indevus

CB1 receptor-agonist/CoX-2/IL-1 Block

Phase 2

Reduces spinal and nerve injury pain

KDS2000 (topical)

Kadmus Pharma

Cannabinoid

Phase 2

Progress in PHN and PDN

AZD 1940

Astra Zeneca

Cannabinoid-receptor agonist

Phase 2

In progress

TRO-19622 (oral)

Trophos

Unknown

Phase 2a

Recruiting PDN patients

AMG403

Amgen

Anti-NGF mAb

Phase2 starting

------

SB-509

Sangamo

Plasmid DNA to up-regulate VEG-F

Phase 2 (PDN)

Disease modifying for diabetes

 


CONCLUSION:

In conclusion, Neuropathic pain is a most common problem in the today’s society. There are several treatment options for it. But keeping severity of pain in mind new molecular targets need to explore. In the current review we elucidated several targets proteins which can plays a key role in neuropathic pain for development of new molecules. By reading the entire articles summary we came to conclusion that different targets, Cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2) have been associated to pain modulation, receptor activation may causes pain, AT2 receptor antagonists represent a completely new class for targeting and designing of drugs, I2 receptors could be a novel class of analgesics, Lymphocyte function associated antigen 1 (LFA-1) is a potential therapeutic approach, The dual FAAH/MAGL inhibitor JZL195 provides a powerful pharmacological action and Electrophilic ketone inhibitor like α-ketoheterocycle (OL-135) is a highly selective inhibitor, these are the crucial protein targets. If we modulate them we can overcome conditions like neuropathic pain.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Myers, R.R., W.M. Campana, and V.I. Shubayev, The role of neuroinflammation in neuropathic pain: mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Drug Discovery Today. 2006. 11(1-2): p. 8-20.

2.      Chaudhary, S., et al., Rationalized Approach for The Treatment of Neuropathic Pain. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021. 14(5): p. 2887-2895.

3.      Purushothaman, P., A. Sha, and T. Vetrichelvan, Formulation development and Evaluation of immediate and sustained release Bilayer Tablets Containing Amitriptyline HCl and Pregabalin for the treatment of Neuropathic Pain. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017. 7(3): p. 127-136.

4.      Brindisi, M., et al., Development and pharmacological characterization of selective blockers of 2-arachidonoyl glycerol degradation with efficacy in rodent models of multiple sclerosis and pain. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2016. 59(6): p. 2612-2632.

5.      Akilashree, S. and P.B. Devi, A Study on Neuropathic Pain: Causes, Grading System, Mechanism-A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019. 12(7): p. 3125-3132.

6.      Van Hecke, O., et al., Neuropathic pain in the general population: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. PAIN®. 2014. 155(4): p. 654-662.

7.      Smith, B.H. and N. Torrance, Epidemiology of neuropathic pain and its impact on quality of life. Current Pain and Headache Reports. 2012. 16(3): p. 191-198.

8.      Amanova, E., et al., Quality of Life of Patients with Neurological Conditions and Neuropathic Pain. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018. 11(2): p. 504-508.

9.      Starowicz, K. and B. Przewlocka, Modulation of neuropathic-pain-related behaviour by the spinal endocannabinoid/endovanilloid system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012. 367(1607): p. 3286-3299.

10.   Otrubova, K., C. Ezzili, and D.L. Boger, The discovery and development of inhibitors of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2011. 21(16): p. 4674-4685.

11.   Basavraj, P. and M. Nitin, Antinociceptive activity of Tulsi Amrit (A Polyherbal Formulation) in selective pain induced models in rats. Research Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 2017. 9(4): p. 173-177.

12.   Blass, B.E., Acyl Sulfonamides NaV1. 7 Blockers Useful for the Treatment of Pain. 2018, ACS Publications.

13.   Bista, P. and W.L. Imlach, Pathological mechanisms and therapeutic targets for trigeminal neuropathic pain. Medicines. 2019. 6(3): p. 91.

14.   Starowicz, K., N. Malek, and B. Przewlocka, Cannabinoid receptors and pain. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Membrane Transport and Signaling. 2013. 2(3): p. 121-132.

15.   Gangadhar, M., et al., Future directions in the treatment of neuropathic pain: A review on various therapeutic targets. CNS and Neurological Disorders-Drug Targets (Formerly Current Drug Targets-CNS and Neurological Disorders). 2014. 13(1): p. 63-81.

16.   Mackie, K., Cannabinoid receptors as therapeutic targets. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2006. 46: p. 101-122.

17.   Jadhav, G.B., et al., Analgesic and Antiinflammatory Activity of Amarwel extracts on experimentally induce pain and inflammation on animals. Research Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 2014. 6(2): p. 112-117.

18.   Pokkula, S., et al., Ameliorative effect of papain on behavioral and bio-chemical alterations in in-silico and In-vivo models of neuropathic pain in rats. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020. 13(8): p. 3807-3812.

19.   Smith, M.T. and A. Muralidharan, Targeting angiotensin II type 2 receptor pathways to treat neuropathic pain and inflammatory pain. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets. 2015. 19(1): p. 25-35.

20.   Li, J.-X., Imidazoline I2 receptors: An update. Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2017. 178: p. 48-56.

21.   Gilron, I. and A.H. Dickenson, Emerging drugs for neuropathic pain. Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs. 2014. 19(3): p. 329-341.

22.   Noor, S., et al., LFA-1 antagonist (BIRT377) similarly reverses peripheral neuropathic pain in male and female mice with underlying sex divergent peripheral immune proinflammatory phenotypes. Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation. 2019. 6.

23.   Adamson Barnes, N.S., et al., Actions of the dual FAAH/MAGL inhibitor JZL195 in a murine neuropathic pain model. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2016. 173(1): p. 77-87.

24.   Witkamp, R., Fatty acids, endocannabinoids and inflammation. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2016. 785: p. 96-107.

25.   Galibert, M., et al., Substrate-derived triazolo-and azapeptides as inhibitors of cathepsins K and S. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2018. 144: p. 201-210.

26.   Scalvini, L., D. Piomelli, and M. Mor, Monoglyceride lipase: Structure and inhibitors. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids. 2016. 197: p. 13-24.

27.   Seierstad, M. and J.G. Breitenbucher, Discovery and development of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitors. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2008. 51(23): p. 7327-7343.

28.   Surana, K., et al., Benzophenone: a ubiquitous scaffold in medicinal chemistry. MedChemComm, 2018. 9(11): p. 1803-1817.

29.   Fowler, C.J., Anandamide uptake explained? Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2012. 33(4): p. 181-185.

30.   Pillarisetti, S. and I. Khanna, A multimodal disease modifying approach to treat neuropathic pain–inhibition of soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH). Drug Discovery Today. 2015. 20(11): p. 1382-1390.

31.   Milo Jr, L.J., et al., Chemical and biological evaluation of dipeptidyl boronic acid proteasome inhibitors for use in prodrugs and pro-soft drugs targeting solid tumors. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2011. 54(13): p. 4365-4377.

32.   Kim, C.F. and G. Moalem-Taylor, Interleukin-17 contributes to neuroinflammation and neuropathic pain following peripheral nerve injury in mice. The Journal of Pain. 2011. 12(3): p. 370-383.

33.   Posa, L., et al., Targeting melatonin MT2 receptors: A novel pharmacological avenue for inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2018. 25(32): p. 3866-3882.

34.   Dib-Hajj, S.D., J.A. Black, and S.G. Waxman, Voltage-gated sodium channels: therapeutic targets for pain. Pain Medicine. 2009. 10(7): p. 1260-1269.

35.   Ma, R.S.Y., et al., Voltage gated sodium channels as therapeutic targets for chronic pain. Journal of Pain Research. 2019. 12: p. 2709.

36.   Sheeba, D. and V.G. Yadav, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and Its Treatment: An Overview. Research Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 2012. 4(3): p. 133-143.

37.   Mathie, A., Ion channels as novel therapeutic targets in the treatment of pain. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2010. 62(9): p. 1089-1095.

38.   Garach, B.D., Postoperative pain after spine surgery: Comparative efficacy of diclofenac and etoricoxib in combination with tramadol and paracetamol at lower doses. Research Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 2013. 5(1): p. 62-68.

 

 

 

 

Received on 18.08.2021         Modified on 02.11.2021

Accepted on 20.01.2022   ©Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved

Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2022; 12(1):96-104.

DOI: 10.52711/2231-5691.2022.00015